Thursday, August 22, 2013

Picasso is so overrated!

How easily to impress are we, when art is involved?

Recently, a study shown that, at classical music competitions, judges seem to evaluate more based on the package in which music is delivered, rather than the music itself (found this at John Baez's blog). Prior to that, it was revealed that judges of abstract art don't guess so well which paintings were made by human artists, and which by monkeys. Wine tasters prefer French wines over Californian, unless the tasting is blind.

So, I finally got courage to say something I want to say for years, but I was afraid to be accused of art blasphemy. I think Picasso is so overrated! In my opinion, just in one painting, Family of Saltimbanques, “the masterpiece of Picasso’s Rose Period”, he severely broke several laws of perspective, physics, and even saltimbanques’s bones (before his cubist period). Below, I annotated a picture from Wikipedia:



The leftmost clown seems to have a problem with his shoulder, or his left humerus is way too long. The young boy carries a barrel, by holding it with a hand which is in front, from its bottom, which is behind. Probably he is using the force, like the lady in the right, who makes her hat levitating, while she probably trains her left hand for a contortion number. And like the overweight red clown, who holds a bag which doesn't hang under the point where it's held, even though he obviously doesn't have the right leg! Although I am by no means an expert, I think that these are elementary mistakes.

Picasso's paintings, together with van Gogh's, are the most expensive paintings in the world.

2 comments:

Unknown said...

Thank you for your courage. Picasso and many other famous big name artists are like the parable of the emperors new suit. People are afraid to admit that much of these famous artists work is crap just like the emperors subjects were afraid of pointing out that he was naked. In both cases people are afraid to speak the truth lest they be thought stupid. I guarantee you that if people, including art professionals saw many of these works and were told they were done by students would judge them much more harshly. They are famous for being famous. Judged on their own merits they are mediocre at best. The painting you talk about is just not very pretty along with the faults you point out.

Cristi Stoica said...

Thanks, Unknown. I can't imagine how different the world would be, if we would be able to see all kings who don't have clothes, in all the domains.