A recent paper entitled
Violation of Heisenberg’s Measurement-Disturbance Relationship by Weak Measurements
appeared (see the
arXiv link to the paper).

This paper was presented to the public in some articles which gave the wrong idea that quantum uncertainty is disproved (see for example Heisenberg uncertainty principle stressed in new test, with the subtitle

I will argue that the experiment presented in the paper

Heisenberg originally stated his principle in terms of

The paper refers to previous theoretical works which disprove

Why do I claim that the violation of

and

[1] Violation of Heisenberg’s Measurement-Disturbance Relationship by Weak Measurements

[2] arXiv link to the paper

[3] Heisenberg uncertainty principle stressed in new test

This paper was presented to the public in some articles which gave the wrong idea that quantum uncertainty is disproved (see for example Heisenberg uncertainty principle stressed in new test, with the subtitle

*"Pioneering experiments have cast doubt on a founding idea of the branch of physics called quantum mechanics."*).I will argue that the experiment presented in the paper

**actually supports Quantum Mechanics**. This may be not quite explicit in the paper, but also there is nothing against the standard view on quantum mechanics in it.Heisenberg originally stated his principle in terms of

*measurement-disturbance relationship*(**MDR**). This is how he understood it at that time. The uncertainty principle which was proven theoretically, either in the context of*wave mechanics*, or from the non-commutativity of the*operators*, is correct, and it's correctness is acknowledged by the paper. This is called*Heisenberg's uncertainty principle*(**HUP**), and is very different from**MDR**.The paper refers to previous theoretical works which disprove

**MDR**, and present experimental evidence purported to confirm the violation of the**MDR**.Why do I claim that the violation of

**MDR**supports Quantum Mechanics? Because, if**MDR**would be correct, it would be enough to explain quantum uncertainty. Recall that even Heisenberg originally thought that the uncertainty is due to disturbance caused by measurement. If the states would behave as they are due to the measurement disturbance, then we could consider them classical, and extract Born's probability rule as we calculate probabilities in statistical mechanics. But we know this is not true. Quantum states exhibit properties which can't be explained by classical mechanisms. Among these,**HUP**plays an important role, together with entanglement. The service made by this paper is that it shows that the*wrong version of the uncertainty principle*can be violated. The authors seem to me to support the**HUP**:"These two readings of the uncertainty principle are typically taught side-by-side, although only the modern one [HUP] is given rigorous proof."

and

"Our work conclusively shows that, although correct for uncertainties in states [HUP], the form of Heisenberg's precision limit is incorrect if naively applied to measurement [MDR]."

[1] Violation of Heisenberg’s Measurement-Disturbance Relationship by Weak Measurements

[2] arXiv link to the paper

[3] Heisenberg uncertainty principle stressed in new test

## No comments:

Post a Comment